< back | 0 - 10 |  
Mark [userpic]

Sign of life

The new year is five days old already, so perhaps it's time to document my new year's eve for posterity's sake. Or something.

I spent NYE with Francesco, Inge and Daphne. Francesco had made dinner which we didn't get to eat until after nine o'clock because we went to Mass beforehand. The Mass, by the way, was a great way to close off the old year. Not only did Father Wagenaar choose to use much Latin, he also used a new incense which produced billowing clouds of fragrance. There was a visible cloud hanging in the sanctuary, slowly drifting towards the choir. All in all, the sights, sounds and smell combined into a full-sensory experience, which won't let you forget the fact that you are at Mass. It was great.

Anyway, back to the three-course dinner, during which Inge and Francesco discussed just about the entire body of theology of the past centuries while I chose to mostly listen and insert a few choice comments here and there. Because dinner started late (although probably at a normal Italian time) it was midnight before we knew it. We ventured out a bit, but the cold soon drove us back inside. The fireworks weren't overly spectacular anyway.

All in all it wasn't among my most spectacular new year's eves, but it doesn't always have to be.

The next day Inge and I watched half of season three of Battlestar Galactica and I really enjoyed the opening episodes: the sheer bleakness of life on New Caprica, and the seeming powerlessness of the two battlestars and their crew was very well done. And the rescue mission, with Galactica jumping into the atmosphere and falling towards the surface to allow the Vipers to engage the Cylons on the surface was amazing.

"Altitude 90,000 and falling like a rock!"



The rest of the weekend wasn't overly exciting. There was a moderate turn-up at the parish's new year's reception, and I enjoyed the chance to speak with Guido, Evine and Tom and Wendy with their little girl.

Mark [userpic]

Moving the blog

January 3rd, 2010 (08:36 pm)

Topday I've taken the step to relocate my Livejournal to here. The top post there explains my reasons why.

I'll keep my Livejournal, though, not least because of the people on my friends list, whose posts I enjoy reading. There is also the fact that someone (I still don't know who) gave me a paid account last summer, and I don't intend to ignore that present for as long as it runs (until next June). So, random observations from my life, serious and otherwise, will continue to appear here.

Mark [userpic]

The remains of the Dutch Church, according to Avvenire

Online Catholic mag Chiesa dedicates some digital pages to the state of the Church in the Netherlands. It republishes an article first published in Avvenire, the newspaper of the Italian bishops' conference. Chiesa's own introduction mentions both the canonisation of Saint Damian last october and the death of Edward Schillebeeckx on Christmas eve, but surprisingly it misunderstands the disregard for Schillebeeckx' theology in some circles as a sign of disregard for Christiniaty. Reality is perhaps not as clear-cut and even quite the opposite. Because those who disagree with many of Schillebeeckx' later writings do so out of an orthodox faith in line with the world Church. The problem they have is not a disregard of the faith, but of those who disregard it themselves.

All the same, this misunderstanding does not change the fact that the Netherlands is very secularised indeed, with many considering themselves areligious, and even more having no appreciable knowledge of Christianity. That became once again clear in Fr. Roderick's television program two weeks ago, in which street interviews showed many people not even being able to name one of the parents of Christ or the location of His birth.

The Avvenire article itself is based on a Christmas experience in Amsterdam. Unbeknownst to too many, perhaps, Amsterdam does not equate with the rest of the Netherlands, certainly not with the northern, eastern and southern parts of the country.

---------------
In Amsterdam, what is left of ChristmasCollapse )

---------------

In my opinion, the picture painted is a bleak and slightly exagerrated one. True, I am not familiar with daily life in Amsterdam, nor do I wish to be, and the whole 'Eurabia' story sounds to me like one created by people unfamiliar with European culture society and life, where immigrations, despite a hiccup every now and then, has always been an integral part. Borders have always been flexible and never far away, after all.

Still, I am happy to see the words from Bishop Punt and Professor Peeters, words I can agree with based on my own limited familiarity with the seminary in question (the Tiltenberg) and the young priests educated there and elsewhere.

I am also glad the author understands that the antagonistic feelings that support Geert Wilders and chums are not so much based on a hate for Muslims or Islam, but on a lack of understanding of anything other than a secular lifestyle.

These are all things that are generally true, of course, and your personal mileage may vary, so to speak.

The article is accompanied by an interview with Cardinal Simonis, emeritus archbishop of Utrecht, and a man who led the Dutch Church through some of its most difficult days.

---------------
Two generations have been lostCollapse )

---------------

The ending is a bit too cute for my taste, but the cardinal nicely counters the idea of the Netherlands as a newly-xenophobic country. As for the rest, there is not much new to be read in the interview, but I like the cardinal's suggestion that salt must become more salty in a situation like this. Not more rigidly orthodox, which was the negative side of the Catholic Church in the first half of the 20th century, but more visibly Catholic. Let the Church come out from its hiding place, let the faithful be seen and heard, so that people who have a sense of emptiness may find direction.

Mark [userpic]

Edward Schillebeeckx' death, what does it mean?

Even a casual glance at the various Catholic media these past days would have made anyone aware of the death of Edward Schillebeeckx, one of the best-known Dutch Catholic theologians of the twentieth century. Schillebeeckx was a Dominican, a professor at the formerly Catholic university of Nijmegen, advisor to the Dutch bishops at the Second Vatican Council and author of many theological books.

He was also subject of much criticism, not only from fellow Dutch Catholics (laity and clergy alike) but also from Rome. The Congregation of the Doctrine of the faith summoned Schillebeeckx to Rome three times to explain his views and in 1986 he was condemned for his denial of the connection between the apostolic succession and the celebration of the Eucharist. His was basically the Protestant view that ministers can be chosen from the people by the people. A bottom-up approach rather than the top-down one of the Church. He was also questioned about his alleged denial of the resurrection of Christ as an objective fact.

In many circles, including some of the more vocal ones on the Internet, he is maligned as the figurehead of the liberal movements in the Dutch Church and he is given much of the blame for the decline of the Church in this country. But in other circles he is very popular, it seems, and seen as a great thinker who showed where the future of the Church lay.

Personally, I don't know what to think. I have never come into contact with Schillebeeckx' books and theology, although I understand his writings are not easily read. Some call them impossible to understand, others say they simply require a certain theological understanding.

The official channels of the Church communicate sadness at his passing and emphasise his achievements, and I believe these do exist: he wasn't asked to be an advisor at Vatican II for no reason, after all. I also believe that one should relate to the dead in a positive manner - they are not to be judged by us, after all.

But as far as the critique goes, it comes from people who evidently have a far greater knowledge of theology than I do, and who have read Schillebeeckx and seen how certain groups took his writings and ideas for their own, to the detriment of the Church. But for me, he is really a non-entity. I recall his name coming up in conversation only once, with Father Michael Wheaton in Exeter, and that was simply because Schillebeeckx was a tentative connection between us: Dutch like me, a theologian like Fr. Michael.

What that tells me is that Schillebeeckx has never had a great effect on my theological and spiritual formation, and that while he is considered influential. Perhaps that influence, then, is smaller, or more limited in time, than his supporters think. An indication that his style of Catholicism, that at the very least influenced the liberal Church of the past decades, is a thing of the past? And would the same then ultimately go for the liberal clubs (the 8 May movement in the past, the small and aging Mariënburg club now) that call themselves Catholic but really aren't?

In the meantime: Requiescat in pace, Edward Schillebeeckx.

Mark [userpic]

The stats of 2009

December 28th, 2009 (06:38 pm)

Livejournal's new stats feature (look for it under the 'Journal' tab) allows me to see how many people have visited my blog on individual days. It only has data since last June, and it is not possible to check more than your latest ten blog posts (at least, none that I have found), but the number of daily visitors does give a nice idea of when my journal was popular. Below are the ten busiest days, with the entries published on that day, of the past six months.

10: My blood, let me give you it and Wisdom is justified (63 visitors on 17 September)
9: Farewell to the city (65 visitors on 20 August)
8: Finding a Mass for the weekend (67 visitors on 21 August)
7: Archbishop Eijk: Monsignor and Manager (70 visitors on 21 November)
6: "Archbishop decision mainly a symbolic act" and The Time Traveler's Wife does get a Dutch release (75 visitors on 13 November)
5: Yet another service announcement (87 visitors on 22 August)
4: Media attention, We're all doomed!, This could be interesting and Ariënskonvikt starts academic year with 24 students (105 visitors on 19 August)
3: A second service announcement, Flight Readiness Review for STS-128, Okay, I'm going to vent now and Interesting, but oh so wrong (209 visitors on 18 August)
2: I'm in the newspaper! Well, sort of..., A beneficial guard at tongue and keyboard and Bits and pieces (224 visitors on 16 August)
1: The dean speaks! Well, e-mails actually, Operation Monsignor Wagenaar: the parish agrees and Service announcement (446 visitors on 17 August)

Unsurprisingly, the busiest days were those around the time of my appearances in the media as a new seminarian, which coincided with the slanderous attacks levelled against me by another blogger. The latter was no fun, but it sure raised the traffic of my blog. I assume that that number was mostly caused by sheer curiosity, but perhaps some readers were genuinely interested.

I am happy to see that a few of my translations of articles also made it into the top ten, chiefly among them of course the one from Bishop de Korte that got the Catholic blogosphere's panties in a twist, but also two about Archbishop Eijk and the Ariënskonvikt.

Of course, keeping a blog for the numbers is never a good idea. However, it is nice when other people read my scribblings, even if they usually do not comment.

Another bit of information concerns what I wrote about in 2009. That's where the tags come in. These are the 20 topic and people with the most appearances:

20: Prayer (31 posts) - Mostly because of my Prayer for Priests project, I think (which I have skipped these past two weeks, I realise. I'll pick it up in the new year.)
19: Archbishop Wim Eijk (32 posts) - The Ariënskonvikt issue accounts for most of that, but I also mentioned him a few times concerning his big interview in NRC and his attendance at events where I was as well.
18: Film (32 posts) - I haven't seen many movies this year, but I guess there was still something to say.
17: Personal issues (36 posts) - A tag I give any post which deals with personal things, of which quite some happened this year, not least concering my vocation.
16: Pope Benedict XVI (37 posts) - The SSPX and the condom issue, but also the fact that the Holy Father is a prolific writer and skilled theologian assures his presence in the top 20.
15: Space Shuttle (38 posts) - Five successful missions in 2009, including the final one to Hubble, and the approaching end of the program.
14: Serving (38 posts) - I served a lot of Masses this year.
13: Finances (40 posts) - A concern that never ends, it sometimes seems.
12: ISS (40 posts) - The International Space Station, tagged often in relation to the Space Shuttle, but certainly also on its own merits. Four shuttle visits, a new Japanese spacecraft and the expansion of the crew from three to six are some of the main highlights.
11: Tiltenberg (42 posts) - The seminary I visited a few times in the first few months of the year and which evidently made enough of an impression to be featured here.
10: Vocation (45 posts) - Perhaps the most prominent issue for me this year, and the one that developed along lines that no one expected.
9: Guido (46 posts) - Friends were my grounding points this year, always there, sometimes more so than I could hope for. Guido and I did many things together this year: student parish stuff, retreats and just hanging out with friends.
8: Mercèdès (46 posts) - Fitting that she is the next in the list. Retreat, student parish and social activities account for her presence as much as Guido's, but so does the fact that I consider her a great friend.
7: Ariënskonvikt (54 posts) - Two reasons for this tag of course: my personal adventure there and the issue of its closing.
6: Inge (57 posts) - In the list because of some shared social media activities, as well as her being a great friend.
5: Father Wagenaar (61 posts) - The priest you can't miss when you're in his parish. And I wouldn't want to miss him either.
4: Bishop Gerard de Korte (62 posts) - He certainly made his presence known in my life and journal in this, his first full year as our bishop. But in his writing and in personal contacts with me has he been a regular presence.
3: Annotated article (66 posts) - Many translations and articles about which I thought I had something to say.
2: Photos (75 posts) - I got ym first camera phone this year and I'm not afraid to use it.
1: Mass (89 posts) - I attended a lot of Masses this year and it is fitting that the Holy Eucharist, source and summit of the liturgy, is at number 1.

Of course, with this post and the ones I may make between now and New Year's Eve, the ilist changes somewhat.

Mark [userpic]

The Queen on modern communication

December 27th, 2009 (08:30 pm)

The annual Christmas address by Queen Beatrix caused a minor stir in certain blogging circles as Her Majesty spoke about social media and its influence on young people today. Let's see if it's really worth getting upset about.

----------------

In the shadow of the times the light of Christmas shines. The Christmas story is set in dark days of oppression and concern. It is the story of the Christ child. Searching for a roof Joseph and Mary found no place in an inn. But they were given a safe place in a stable all the same. There Jesus was born. With his arrival the light of love that connects us to God and our fellow man shines in our world.

The ancient call is essential: love your neighbour like yourself. Today it is less clear what that means. Do we still know who our neighbour is? It is everyone who we meet: the fellow people in our lives. But do we see them? Do we ignore those we may need our support and help or are we open for approach and contact and a helping hand? No matter how good professional care may be, we are still reliant on a society in which people see one another. In times of difficulty and sorrow we simply can't expect everything from the government and social institutions. But luckily there are many we make an effort to do what is necessary.

In this time of globalisation, speed has increased and distance shortened. Technical advances and individualisation have made people more independent and distant. We are increasingly left to our own devices. But a place that we can call home, where we can trust the people around us and where we can expect solidarity, remains enormously important. Perhaps the greatest challenge is how the individual and society can reconnect and reestablish trust. The credit crunch also teaches us that.

When concerns are great, the need for a shared perspective grows. Religions and life philosophies point at a responsibility for the neighbour. In the past mutual aid was omnipresent and it formed the basis of society. People knew one another. But modern people seems to have little attention for their neighbour. Now they are mostly concerned with themselves. We tend to look away and close our eyes and ears for our surroundings. Even our neighbours are sometimes strangers these days. People talk without having a conversation, they look without seeing each other. People communicate via short quick messages. Our society grows increasingly individualistic. Personal freedom has become separate from connection to the community. But without a sense of 'we' our existence grows empty. This void can not be filled with virtual encounters; on the contrary, distances grow larger. The ideal of the liberated individual has reached its end point. We must try and find a way back to what connects us.

We fell increasingly less solidarity and compassion towards our fellow men. Tangible closeness is required to live with someone. True contact is formed from words and action. Language is essential to build trust. But if w don't engage in conversation, we exclude ourselves. That is how a means to bring people closer together can also be a barrier for someone who does not understand and is not understood. Then there is no unity and neighbours remain outsiders.

True words and images we see a lot of sorrow, but that is often so far removed and causes feelings of powerlessness more than anything. Too much information numbs. That is perhaps how we have grown blind and deaf to our neighbours. Compassion is nudged aside. A sense of community is lost.

Modern technological means seem to bring people closer together, but they remain at a 'safe' distance, hiding behind their screens. We can now speak without showing ourselves, without being seen, anonymously. Simply venting emotions has become easier. No one is held accountable for speaking disrespectfully. It is not being a stranger that makes other aggressive, but aggression that makes the other a stranger.

The neighbour seems strange and far away, but in need we suddenly see how sympathy is suddenly triggered, causing people to efface themselves, conquer hesitation, set aside fear or dislike and do everything for a person in need. In the most difficult of circumstances compassion can show itself in true brotherly love. Then the beauty in people shows: the willingness to selflessly give aid, to be there for strangers, to support them in despair and pain. Compassion connects us to our neighbour in need. A hand held, a voice encouraging and eyes aimed at contact can piercingly deliver the message of brotherly love. Our nation has a great tradition of voluntary effort for others.

Our world needs people with passion and involvement, who gives room for those outside, who are there for others and who keep believing in good.

Christmas creates an atmosphere of warmth and closeness. In the stable at the crowded inn is the humble place where Jesus' life begins. In the dark of that night the light shines of peace on earth and love for our neighbour.

I wish you all a blessed Christmas.

----------------

I can't disagree with most of what the queen says. Our society has grown very individualistic, which does not mean, of course, that no one is capable of being social. I hope we can all name one or more people who we consider very close friends indeed. But as a general trend, I think we do see a society where people are loners: we are able to do a lot without ever needing anyone else, and if we do need someone else, it is often easier to send a text message, an email or a tweet then to make a phone cal. I do that myself as well.

But the picture painted is a bit one-sided. Social networks like Twitter and Facebook, and tools like SMS and e-mail have created digital societies with their own groups of neighbours. These may be many hundreds of kilometers removed from each other, but at the same time they are just one mouse click away.

So, while I think there is more to the world of social networking and the like than the queen seems to say here (and I certainly do not believe it plays much of a role when it comes to the cause of the increase in individualism), I do think she is right to point it out. I am not certain what can and cannot be done to counter it, to find the way back, so to speak. And perhaps that is not something we can do in the form of a great concerted government-sponsored effort. Perhaps it needs to come from what ironically (and a bit incorrectly) sounds like the root of the problem: the individual.

Mark [userpic]

"The Lord is here": The Papal homily for Christmas Eve

Via the example of the shephers, Pope Benedict XVI guides us, in his Christmas homily to the very core of Christmas: the Incarnation of the Word and the importance to each and every one of us. It is worth a read, and I mean that. Not only does the homily shed a light on the Christmas Gospels that will be new to many, it also shows the deep theological and pastoral awareness of the Holy Father.

-------------

Dear Brothers and Sisters!

"A child is born for us, a son is given to us" (Is 9:5). What Isaiah prophesied as he gazed into the future from afar, consoling Israel amid its trials and its darkness, is now proclaimed to the shepherds as a present reality by the Angel, from whom a cloud of light streams forth: "To you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord" (Lk 2:11). The Lord is here. From this moment, God is truly "God with us". No longer is he the distant God who can in some way be perceived from afar, in creation and in our own consciousness. He has entered the world. He is close to us. The words of the risen Christ to his followers are addressed also to us: "Lo, I am with you always, to the close of the age" (Mt 28:20). For you the Saviour is born: through the Gospel and those who proclaim it, God now reminds us of the message that the Angel announced to the shepherds. It is a message that cannot leave us indifferent. If it is true, it changes everything. If it is true, it also affects me. Like the shepherds, then, I too must say: Come on, I want to go to Bethlehem to see the Word that has occurred there. The story of the shepherds is included in the Gospel for a reason. They show us the right way to respond to the message that we too have received. What is it that these first witnesses of God’s incarnation have to tell us?

The first thing we are told about the shepherds is that they were on the watch – they could hear the message precisely because they were awake. We must be awake, so that we can hear the message. We must become truly vigilant people. What does this mean? The principal difference between someone dreaming and someone awake is that the dreamer is in a world of his own. His “self” is locked into this dreamworld that is his alone and does not connect him with others. To wake up means to leave that private world of one’s own and to enter the common reality, the truth that alone can unite all people. Conflict and lack of reconciliation in the world stem from the fact that we are locked into our own interests and opinions, into our own little private world. Selfishness, both individual and collective, makes us prisoners of our interests and our desires that stand against the truth and separate us from one another. Awake, the Gospel tells us. Step outside, so as to enter the great communal truth, the communion of the one God. To awake, then, means to develop a receptivity for God: for the silent promptings with which he chooses to guide us; for the many indications of his presence. There are people who describe themselves as “religiously tone deaf”. The gift of a capacity to perceive God seems as if it is withheld from some. And indeed – our way of thinking and acting, the mentality of today’s world, the whole range of our experience is inclined to deaden our receptivity for God, to make us “tone deaf” towards him. And yet in every soul, the desire for God, the capacity to encounter him, is present, whether in a hidden way or overtly. In order to arrive at this vigilance, this awakening to what is essential, we should pray for ourselves and for others, for those who appear “tone deaf” and yet in whom there is a keen desire for God to manifest himself. The great theologian Origen said this: if I had the grace to see as Paul saw, I could even now (during the Liturgy) contemplate a great host of angels (cf. in Lk 23:9). And indeed, in the sacred liturgy, we are surrounded by the angels of God and the saints. The Lord himself is present in our midst. Lord, open the eyes of our hearts, so that we may become vigilant and clear-sighted, in this way bringing you close to others as well!

Let us return to the Christmas Gospel. It tells us that after listening to the Angel’s message, the shepherds said one to another: “‘Let us go over to Bethlehem’ … they went at once” (Lk 2:15f.). “They made haste” is literally what the Greek text says. What had been announced to them was so important that they had to go immediately. In fact, what had been said to them was utterly out of the ordinary. It changed the world. The Saviour is born. The long-awaited Son of David has come into the world in his own city. What could be more important? No doubt they were partly driven by curiosity, but first and foremost it was their excitement at the wonderful news that had been conveyed to them, of all people, to the little ones, to the seemingly unimportant. They made haste – they went at once. In our daily life, it is not like that. For most people, the things of God are not given priority, they do not impose themselves on us directly. And so the great majority of us tend to postpone them. First we do what seems urgent here and now. In the list of priorities God is often more or less at the end. We can always deal with that later, we tend to think. The Gospel tells us: God is the highest priority. If anything in our life deserves haste without delay, then, it is God’s work alone. The Rule of Saint Benedict contains this teaching: “Place nothing at all before the work of God (i.e. the divine office)”. For monks, the Liturgy is the first priority. Everything else comes later. In its essence, though, this saying applies to everyone. God is important, by far the most important thing in our lives. The shepherds teach us this priority. From them we should learn not to be crushed by all the pressing matters in our daily lives. From them we should learn the inner freedom to put other tasks in second place – however important they may be – so as to make our way towards God, to allow him into our lives and into our time. Time given to God and, in his name, to our neighbour is never time lost. It is the time when we are most truly alive, when we live our humanity to the full.

Some commentators point out that the shepherds, the simple souls, were the first to come to Jesus in the manger and to encounter the Redeemer of the world. The wise men from the East, representing those with social standing and fame, arrived much later. The commentators go on to say: this is quite natural. The shepherds lived nearby. They only needed to “come over” (cf. Lk 2:15), as we do when we go to visit our neighbours. The wise men, however, lived far away. They had to undertake a long and arduous journey in order to arrive in Bethlehem. And they needed guidance and direction. Today too there are simple and lowly souls who live very close to the Lord. They are, so to speak, his neighbours and they can easily go to see him. But most of us in the world today live far from Jesus Christ, the incarnate God who came to dwell amongst us. We live our lives by philosophies, amid worldly affairs and occupations that totally absorb us and are a great distance from the manger. In all kinds of ways, God has to prod us and reach out to us again and again, so that we can manage to escape from the muddle of our thoughts and activities and discover the way that leads to him. But a path exists for all of us. The Lord provides everyone with tailor-made signals. He calls each one of us, so that we too can say: “Come on, ‘let us go over’ to Bethlehem – to the God who has come to meet us. Yes indeed, God has set out towards us. Left to ourselves we could not reach him. The path is too much for our strength. But God has come down. He comes towards us. He has travelled the longer part of the journey. Now he invites us: come and see how much I love you. Come and see that I am here. Transeamus usque Bethlehem, the Latin Bible says. Let us go there! Let us surpass ourselves! Let us journey towards God in all sorts of ways: along our interior path towards him, but also along very concrete paths – the Liturgy of the Church, the service of our neighbour, in whom Christ awaits us.

Let us once again listen directly to the Gospel. The shepherds tell one another the reason why they are setting off: “Let us see this thing that has happened.” Literally the Greek text says: “Let us see this Word that has occurred there.” Yes indeed, such is the radical newness of this night: the Word can be seen. For it has become flesh. The God of whom no image may be made – because any image would only diminish, or rather distort him – this God has himself become visible in the One who is his true image, as Saint Paul puts it (cf. 2 Cor 4:4; Col 1:15). In the figure of Jesus Christ, in the whole of his life and ministry, in his dying and rising, we can see the Word of God and hence the mystery of the living God himself. This is what God is like. The Angel had said to the shepherds: “This will be a sign for you: you will find a babe wrapped in swaddling clothes and lying in a manger” (Lk 2:12; cf. 2:16). God’s sign, the sign given to the shepherds and to us, is not an astonishing miracle. God’s sign is his humility. God’s sign is that he makes himself small; he becomes a child; he lets us touch him and he asks for our love. How we would prefer a different sign, an imposing, irresistible sign of God’s power and greatness! But his sign summons us to faith and love, and thus it gives us hope: this is what God is like. He has power, he is Goodness itself. He invites us to become like him. Yes indeed, we become like God if we allow ourselves to be shaped by this sign; if we ourselves learn humility and hence true greatness; if we renounce violence and use only the weapons of truth and love. Origen, taking up one of John the Baptist’s sayings, saw the essence of paganism expressed in the symbol of stones: paganism is a lack of feeling, it means a heart of stone that is incapable of loving and perceiving God’s love. Origen says of the pagans: “Lacking feeling and reason, they are transformed into stones and wood” (in Lk 22:9). Christ, though, wishes to give us a heart of flesh. When we see him, the God who became a child, our hearts are opened. In the Liturgy of the holy night, God comes to us as man, so that we might become truly human. Let us listen once again to Origen: “Indeed, what use would it be to you that Christ once came in the flesh if he did not enter your soul? Let us pray that he may come to us each day, that we may be able to say: I live, yet it is no longer I that live, but Christ lives in me (Gal 2:20)” (in Lk 22:3).

Yes indeed, that is what we should pray for on this Holy Night. Lord Jesus Christ, born in Bethlehem, come to us! Enter within me, within my soul. Transform me. Renew me. Change me, change us all from stone and wood into living people, in whom your love is made present and the world is transformed. Amen.

Mark [userpic]

Christmas wishes

December 24th, 2009 (01:59 pm)

It's already Christmas in some parts of the world, and I await the arrival of midnight with anticipation. I'm really looking forward to midnight Mass and I hope the expected glazed frost won't keep too many people at home.

Anyway, to my friends here, the readers of my journal and everyone they hold dear:



(by the way, despite appearances, this was not inspired by ingridairam's last post.)

Mark [userpic]

What's beyond the solar system?

December 24th, 2009 (10:03 am)

Well, according to the old Voyager probes something that no one thought should be there. Just beyond the edge of the so-called heliosheath, where the solar wind meets the interstellar medium, is something scientists have dubbed the Local Interstellar Cloud or Local Fluff for short. It's about 30 light years wide and consists of a smattering of hydrogen and helium atoms at a temperature of 6000 degrees Celsius. The unexpected nature of the Local Fluff is that it manages to exist despite the pressure of a surrounding bubble of gas that is the result of series of supernovas that happened some 10 million years ago. And the Fluff should nto be able to withstand that.

But it does because its much more strongly magnetised than suspected. I'm not sure how that works, but due to that we inhabit this bubble among supernova remnants, and our solar system ploughs through it, creating a bow shock along the way. And the two Voyager probes entered that in 2004 and 2007 respectively. Both probes detected early on that the bow shock, the heliosheath, is not symmetrical and perhaps that is explained by the pressures outside it. Who knows what the old probes will find in the coming years.



Voyager 1 and 2 were launched in 1977 on a mission to visit and explore the outer planets of our solar system. The alignment of the planets in the 1980s allowed for a so-called Grand Tour of the solar system, where a probe could travel from one planet to the next via gravity assists: the gravitational pull of one planet would alter the trajectory of the probe and speed it up, basically flinging it to the next planet in the line.

Voyager 1 flew by Jupiter in 1979 and Saturn in 1980. It is now 16.49 billion kilometers distant and it takes 14.6 hours for signals from Earth to reach it.

Voyager 2 arrived at Jupiter a few months after Voyager 1 and at Saturn in 1981. It then was able to fly by Uranus in 1986 and Neptune in 1989. It is now 13.38 billion kilometers away, more than twice as far as Pluto and is expected to continue transmitting weak signals until 2025.

Mark [userpic]

Playbacking for money

We've had the flash mob to Snow Patrol's 'Just Say Yes', but another great moment durign Serious Request happened last night. During the 2007 edition DJ Gerard Ekdom playbacked to 'Living Doll' by Cliff Richard and The Young Ones and he said he'd do it again if the amount of money raised by that song then was at least matched now. Well, last night it was more than doubled: 14,238 euros in total. Se Gerard had no excuse, and there he went.

For some reason the video is a full hour, but the section in question starts at 45:40.

< back | 0 - 10 |